Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: In this sense, the behavior of pigs after vaccination against PCV2 and Mhp with Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and/or Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) has been identified with this objective, where the piglets were more oriented, allowed touching, stood more, and ate more, demonstrating a greater level of welfare.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: In this sense, the behavior of pigs after vaccination against PCV2 and Mhp with Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and/or Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) has been identified with this objective, where the piglets were more oriented, allowed touching, stood more, and ate more, demonstrating a greater level of welfare.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: T1, T2, and T4 received the vaccines FLEXCombo ® : (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) for immunization against PCV2 and Mhp.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: T1, T2, and T4 received the vaccines FLEXCombo ® : (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) for immunization against PCV2 and Mhp.

Techniques: Injection, Saline